People tend to take offense when being Vague. I'm attempting to understand why this is. People have a need to take things seriously, probably because vagueness is a lack of conviction. Vagueness is not having much to say but saying something any way, so its a step up on nothingness. It could also be viewed as the excess of saying nothing. The last point seems to mirror most Relationships, i mean this in all its connotations. The way to avoid vagueness is to write something and over time pad it out with Meaning, this is the same with life, you pad it out over the course of it. This will move a thing away from vagueness but its sort of dishonest, but you can't argue with progress either. That is If you consider a move away from vagueness to be progress.
I like the device of being vague and will always opt for it over ambiguity. Art dislikes vagueness but will zealously promote ambiguity, because its easier psychologically and there is always the need to believe there is something beyond the superficial.
Television likes vagueness, it allows viewers to passively participate. It lets you fill the gaps by allowing for gaps, leeway. Its a sort of guided freedom where the amusement is as much in your head as it is the show (some art does this).
Monday, December 27, 2010
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Seinfeld, indifference and irony
My understanding of why i like Seinfeld took a big step forward. All four of the characters have a hefty level of indifference towards most things, even Elaine (what a woman). Because of this the show overwhelms with an excess of irony. Their indifference implements many of the key ironic moments, they appear to constantly test of the boundaries of convention within everyday life.
Tommy.
Tommy.
This feels very much like a situation i could have instigated. |
Indifference is Ironic.
This statement I found hard to comprehend for some time. I'll start with Art. Art is like the handicapped child of the world, people work with it and hope that it will come to fruition at some point but all are unsure how so. Art in the past has had a purpose, the works with religious and biblical references were used to aid the church in altering its subjects perceptions. Portraiture was used for posterity and to demonstrate ones importance. The paintings of Claude Monet are beautiful which is enough reason for me.
Today the art forum tries to convince (itself mostly) that it is a powerful force, bringing about social improvement. Art can only every be used as supplement for altering models of thinking (in general) and this is where it stops. As it is people thoughts, actions and words thats really change things. Art will always be confined to a supplementary position.
Indifference is ironic because indifference is recognizably a greater investment into something. Its the choice of maintaining a distance towards a thing because one does not fully agree, or doesn't like the appearance of been in unconsidered agreement. But really it is just a slightly altered take on the same situation and thats what really makes it ironic, its a redefining of the same situation. Indifference is really just slight difference.
Tommy
Zizek! the movie.
Slavoj Zizek on Toilet |
Parts I particularly like are: When he speaks about telling someone you love them and how we always distance ourselves within the process, whereas the ancients would have said it and meant it. so he purposed that it is us who really believe its excessive meaning, i guess thats irony.
Also when he uses the example of an old fashion totalitarian father telling his kid that they have to see their grandma on sunday, whereas the tolerant postmodern father would say something like "you know how much your grandmother loves you, nether the less you should only go see her if you really want to. This statement contains a more powerful form of control, because now the kid knows they have to go but also like it. Zizek states this is the same within out current culture of tolerance and understanding, calling it dishonest.
Within the intro there is his comment: "theology doesn't solve problems, it redefines them." I like this as it is the same with everything. This past year i have been stuck on Resignification.
He also picks up a Copy of the film Being there with Peter Sellers, its one of my favs!
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Hhi
So it has been awhile, got side tracked. But since I am about to embark on a whole bunch of new stuff, There should be heaps of stuff.
I just graduated,so think I'll put that into a Aphorism. "Graduation is a lot like receiving the bill after the meal, which is cool if you feel fully satisfied. But anything less and its just a document taunting: you shouldn't have paid that much.
I just graduated,so think I'll put that into a Aphorism. "Graduation is a lot like receiving the bill after the meal, which is cool if you feel fully satisfied. But anything less and its just a document taunting: you shouldn't have paid that much.
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Tommy Robson, 2010. Currently untitled. |
Monday, September 13, 2010
The problem with a Cliche.
I don't actually believe there is any problems with Cliché's. Cliché's are things that have been elevated to the status of being almost recognizably universal. They are accepted as almost true, in the same way a aphorism is. So this is where i get to the problem. It is people that see them as being completely true, making due with lackluster portrayal, missing the ironic punch line that could be reached and instead, they just waste a good trick.
The Matrix.
Picked this image due to it being out of focus, something i am infamous for. |
I think People miss the real power of Christianity. Its power comes its teachings in the bible, not because they are true but because of their ability subvert general thinking, exposing the masses to modes of lateral thinking and speculative thought. Neo's path has some uncanny similarities to that of Jesus, I am not suggesting that this a major influence of just the matrix but that of all out ideas.
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Marilyn Monroe
I needed something to write a post about and I just couldn't get past the images of Marilyn Monroe. She seemed to know that, in order to achieve a compelling photograph, you need to be able to dramatize aspects of facial expressions, like a caricature. The minuteness of a regular expression doesn't translate to photographs, there isn't enough distance between many. Perhaps this is why there doesn't seem to be a bad photo of her in existence. Unlike models of today, who clearly have no idea of their faces or the performative aspect. She new that the camera can not distinguish when someone is faking it. There isn't a present day model that can stand next to her. I hear Angelina Jolie may be playing her haha, I really hope not.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Imperial Bedrooms, Bret Easton Ellis
This post is to forewarn those who might be interested, that i will be posting a book review(of sorts) here in the near future on Bret Easton Ellis's latest book Imperial Bedrooms, author of American Psycho.
So if your interested in what i think keep an eye out, as i haven't read its prequel less than zero and am tossing up whether to read it first, give it a couple months. also Slavoj Žižek has a new book out, maybe i could make this a thing
more about Running Wilde & Will Arnett
http://iheartcolapinto.com/?p=9289
I came across this funny spread of Arnett in GQ Magazine, publicizing his due to come out TV series. I think the world is ripe for likes of me.
Monday, August 30, 2010
Nip Tuck. vanity, we make it look good.
Deeply Superficial, haha yeah thats it. |
Every episode starts with the line "so, tell us what you don't like about yourself." (perhaps this is what we should start ask people who we just met, instead of the usual, so what do you do?) It is a question that could be associated with a therapist, which they are clearly not. This imposing question is the reverse of the genuine display of compassion, It isolates away the concept of humanity and instead reduces someone to the comical value of their most distressing traits.
The question itself is at a ironic distance from social normality. This is much like how Woody Allen is always revealing what he doesn't like about himself, showing a formal acceptance. But with the patients of nip/tuck, they have not. This to is ironic and further removes them from the realm of humanness. But despite the bleakness of this position, i believe there is something inherently beautiful about western vanity.
Beauty like money is a fetishistic item, its hard to understand how it works. We know that for a lot of people it is quite consuming. None of us are sure if we have enough so the easiest solution is just to accumulate more. We shape ourselves around those we consider to possess it. Nip/Tuck tries to reveal the desperation and ugliness that can be observed with this almost normal cultural obsession. The show makes use of the myths and stories seem to never tier of being told among us. This is sort a synopsis of our postmodernist times, where the most interesting elements survive and eventually all else loses it time share. Leaving us with a surplus of bizarre happenings. Although most of us possibly only experience a couple of these in our lives, by proxy we all hold onto many more and in a way are more and more likely to repeat them in slight variations. But the point I'm trying to make is that this exaggerated vanity is a shared desperation, the fact that appears ironic proves that we have admitted this and hear in lies the beauty, Western vanity is met with indifference and indifference is always ironic. Ironic in that the position held is one maintaining a distance from pathological vanity, while acknowledging it as a valuable part of our culture, a part all of us contribute to.
Tommy.
Thursday, August 26, 2010
astronaut.
Tommy Robson, (2010). Spaceman (#2). photographic image. |
The outfit is just edifice, the less i have to do to achieve a sufficient outcome is what I desired. kind of like scoring less inhibited girls is for blokes.
Tommy.
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
I love Will Arnett
Will Arnett, a very nice photo |
Will Arnett, currently has to be one of my favorite people. The perfect idiot, he truly is brilliant. He played one of key characters or Arrested Development, Perhaps the single best loose sitcom since Seinfeld.
A show that has become a thing in itself and could taint the reception of his show, Running Wilde.
The name I am not so convinced of. But I'm personally glad a man as inherently funny as Will Arnett has been provided with a platform, affording him to stay present within the industry, in a big way.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYfRSHilLcs The trailer, I especially like his line near the end "not if i can make you a worse woman first."
Tommy of Sufficing Tommy
P.s if you haven't scene Arrested Development, i highly suggest you give it a chance some time.
Me and John Banks shaking hands.
Me with Auckland's mayor John banks |
Not a very good photo of me. Look how well John Banks performs the hand shake.
Labels:
2010,
auckland,
handshakes,
John Banks,
mayor,
Myself
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Goodshirt and an epiphany about being a New Zealander.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLZenBtiBAU
I'm not pronouncing Goodshirt to be a ground breaking band. But they are a band by listening to have caused an epiphany, about some of the positive characteristics of creative kiwi's.
We operate within a space that is contradictory, we are unsophisticatedly sophisticated with our approach towards humor and idea's. Within the song Fall (i think) they make use of a standard keyboard organ effect, which to me is something i remember about New Zealand churches, most not containing a real organ, instead making use of casio keyboards. I found it to be incredibly amusing, due to its subtly irony and light desperation. It can be claim as a sort of kiwi tradition.
Unlike america with their slapstick humor or the british with their dry wit, New Zealanders seem to make some unconvincingly witty, almost slapstick joke's while at the same time proclaim a degree of innocence (appearing like simple minded folk) but this is a structural component of the joke itself. we are perhaps described as being a touch more subversive.
A friend Jed once tried to explain why it is that out a small number of people know to us, most are incredibly peculiar. What Jed believed is that we all grew up so so board, as a way of coping with the extent of our unified boredom, we developed a perverse style of humor, new zealand humor.
I do believe it to be a positive thing, it gives us something unique to offer.
A country thats a total non event, i think that is just brilliant.
Tommy
I'm not pronouncing Goodshirt to be a ground breaking band. But they are a band by listening to have caused an epiphany, about some of the positive characteristics of creative kiwi's.
We operate within a space that is contradictory, we are unsophisticatedly sophisticated with our approach towards humor and idea's. Within the song Fall (i think) they make use of a standard keyboard organ effect, which to me is something i remember about New Zealand churches, most not containing a real organ, instead making use of casio keyboards. I found it to be incredibly amusing, due to its subtly irony and light desperation. It can be claim as a sort of kiwi tradition.
Unlike america with their slapstick humor or the british with their dry wit, New Zealanders seem to make some unconvincingly witty, almost slapstick joke's while at the same time proclaim a degree of innocence (appearing like simple minded folk) but this is a structural component of the joke itself. we are perhaps described as being a touch more subversive.
A friend Jed once tried to explain why it is that out a small number of people know to us, most are incredibly peculiar. What Jed believed is that we all grew up so so board, as a way of coping with the extent of our unified boredom, we developed a perverse style of humor, new zealand humor.
I do believe it to be a positive thing, it gives us something unique to offer.
A country thats a total non event, i think that is just brilliant.
Tommy
Saturday, August 21, 2010
Whitecliffe Graduate show 2010
2010 Whitecliffe College graduate show.
Date: Friday, 26th November, 2010, 5.30pm. Venue: St Georges Bay Road Studios and Pearce Gallery
The current graduating year is perhaps one of the more distinctive groups to arise out of Whitecliffe in a while. A year possessing a unique blend of fruits, by fruits I mean points of difference. The diversity of attitudes has resulted in a fresh year and there should be something accessible for almost every taste and orientation.
While some posse the attributes of being moody and disconcerting. Others indulge in humor and produce work with a youthful element, allowing for presuppositions to remain light. There will be connections observe between some, while others will leave you guessing and maybe intrigued.
There is bound to be plenty of drink and perhaps appetizers. It will be without a doubt, a night of excesses for all who partake. This is a year never to repeat; all you will need to do is show up and let us take care of the rest.
Please feel free to contact me for more information:
Trob01@whitecliffe.ac.nz
0273042290
Otherwise Whitecliffe at:
Phone +64 9 309 5970
Facsimile +64 9 302 2957
Email info@whitecliffe.ac.nz
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Mid Yr Series, Handshakes.
Tommy Robson, (2010). all images. 36 x 30cm photographic pigment print on cotton rag |
Accompanying Statement,
The handshake is a universal gesture that is instinctively recognised. We understand what it means but its recognition is so intuitive that we do not stop to consider it. If we did, we may observe this distinct gap between the inferred content and the superficial representation of the gesture itself.
It is one of the most powerful political tools, yet it means almost nothing.
Monday, August 16, 2010
Hitler In Disguise
hitler in disguise |
My very 1st bog post, feeling in touch
Fullcream image 10 2010 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
- Tommy
- There is me, then there is you and between us there is a gap. My blogs purpose is to fill this gap plus there will be my artwork and ideas sometimes. Tommy, a piece of me in every home (some day).